
Challenging the Kite Flying Act 2025 in LHC
A significant legal challenge has emerged against the Kite Flying Act 2025. Recently, a petition was filed in the Lahore High Court (LHC) seeking to suspend this controversial law. Furthermore, the petitioner also requested a declaration that the act itself is unconstitutional. This move has ignited a crucial debate regarding public safety and legal frameworks surrounding traditional festivals.

Constitutional Questions and Public Safety Concerns
Sheikh Imtiaz Mahmood, a respected member of the Punjab Assembly, initiated this miscellaneous petition. Represented by Advocate Azhar Siddiq, Mahmood firmly asserts that the law in question violates fundamental constitutional provisions. Consequently, the plea highlights ongoing concerns about the safety risks associated with kite flying.
Indeed, kite flying remains largely prohibited in Pakistan, often treated as a non-bailable offense. This strict stance reflects the severe dangers it poses to both human life and property. Moreover, a call-attention notice concerning this issue has already reached the provincial assembly, underscoring its urgency.

Dangerous Loopholes and International Precedents
Disturbingly, the petition also points out potential threats to public safety stemming from government notifications. These claims suggest that permissions allow the manufacture of kites and strings within residential areas. Therefore, such permissions could significantly escalate the risk of accidents and injuries, especially during Basant celebrations.
The petitioner further informed the court about global precedents. Specifically, several nations, including China, have imposed complete bans on Basant due to its proven dangerous consequences. He passionately argued that enforcing such legislation directly contradicts public interest and crucial safety imperatives.

Seeking Immediate Suspension and a Final Verdict
Ultimately, the petition formally requests the LHC to declare the Kite Flying Act 2025 null and void. Moreover, it seeks an immediate suspension of its implementation, alongside all related notifications. This interim suspension would remain in effect until the court issues its final verdict, ensuring public safety in the meantime.







